The cybersecurity industry has a terminal identity problem.
We’ve accepted that identity is a login. A credential. A token to be stolen, replayed, or spoofed. And every time we patch this model — with MFA, behavioral analytics, or conditional access — we just reinforce a broken premise:
That identity is something you prove at a checkpoint.
In the Cybersecurity Constitution™, Article II declares the opposite.
🛡️ Identity is not a username. It’s a governed designation — enforced by enclave and validated by protocol.
That’s what TrustNet™ is built for:
No federated logins.
No central identity store.
No fallback to “trust the vendor.”
Instead:
Identity exists within the enclave that governs it.
Validation is performed via quorum, not assumption.
And revocation is instant — no vendor call required.
If you’re still treating identity as a service, you're not securing your terrain — you're leasing it.
đź’ˇ Ready for a doctrine-based approach to identity governance?
Explore the TrustNet™ mandate now at manuelwlloyd.com/interopsis-adoption