Government Pilot

For federal, state, and national-security entities.

Focus Areas:

• sovereign cyber operations

• LAWS™ Article VI compliance

• enclave deployment for classified or sensitive workloads

• identity governance (TrustNet™)

• post-breach regeneration (PHOENIX™)

• Zero Doctrine™ readiness across agencies

Outcomes:

• improved warfighting-level cyber posture

• elimination of cross-contamination

• rapid crisis containment

Critical Infrastructure Pilot

For energy, water, utilities, transportation, aviation, maritime & industrial systems.

Focus Areas:

• supply chain and OTA integrity (Article X)

• operational enclave isolation

• air-gapped control systems

• Multi-Partner Resilience Exercises (Article VIII Clause)

• emergency operations under Zero Doctrine™

Outcomes:

• zero exposure environment for OT/ICS

• resilient operations during attack conditions

• doctrine-ready CI governance

Defense Contractors & OEMs Pilot

For aerospace, defense, integrators, system builders, hardware manufacturers, and OEMs.

Focus Areas:

• Multi-Net Security Framework™ integration

• protocol compliance (Annex II: Registry)

• protocol mutation (Annex VI)

• enclave-enabled R&D

• sovereign identity & supply chain guarantees

Outcomes:

• OEM-aligned doctrine standards

• guaranteed sovereign-origin technical input

• improved contract positioning for federal buyers

Enterprise (Fortune 500) Pilot

For large-scale commercial organizations seeking sovereign governance & resilience.

Focus Areas:

• identity and governance realignment (TrustNet™)

• post-quantum protection (QuantumGuard™)

• data lifecycle control (DataGuardian™)

• crisis containment policies (QuickStrike™)

• executive readiness simulation (SecureTrain™)

Outcomes:

• enterprise-wide doctrinal governance

• removal of systemic failure points

• improved resilience and board-level assurance

Government Pilot—Deployment Documentation

Mission Scope

Deploy a sovereign enclave and doctrinal governance model enabling federal or government agencies to operate under Zero Doctrine™ conditions, eliminating cross-domain exposure and modern nation-state attack vectors.

Includes identity governance, enclave lockdown, deception terrain modeling, and crisis-response alignment.

Doctrinal Articles Applied

• Article I — Digital Sovereignty

• Article III — Identity & Trust Governance

• Article V — Systems, Exposure, & Deception Terrain

• Article VI — LAWS™ (Land, Air, Water, Space) Domain Governance

• Article VIII — Multi-Partner Resilience Exercises

• Article X — Supply Chain Integrity & OTA Control

Annexes:

• Annex II — Protocol Registry

• Annex IV — Red Team Doctrine Brief

• Annex V — Enclave Registry

Protocols Involved

• DNA™ — Data Nexus Assignment

• S.T.E.A.L.T.H.™ — Air-gapped sovereign enclaves

• TrustNet™ — Identity quorum governance

• Multi-Net Framework™ — GovNet isolation

• AegisAI™ — Predictive defense & adversarial deception

• QuickStrike™ — Crisis containment

• REVIVE™ — Resilience validation

• PHOENIX™ — Post-breach regeneration

• QuantumGuard™ — PQC enforcement

• AuditNet™ — Regulatory oversight enclave

Expected Outcomes

• Elimination of cross-domain exposure across federal mission systems

• Sovereign control of identity, access, and mission data

• Mission-critical workloads removed from public internet reliance

• Improved warfighting-grade cyber posture

• Executive-level doctrinal readiness

• A validated enclave with measurable SuccessMatrix™ scoring

• Pilot-to-deployment path established for wider agency adoption

Resource Requirements

• Pilot leadership group (CIO/CISO, mission owner, trust officer)

• 3–5 technical operators or enclave engineers

• Access to current identity systems for TrustNet™ mapping

• One pilot workload or mission use-case

• Dedicated environment (gov cloud, on-prem, or hybrid)

• Executive access for simulations

Readiness Scoring

Based on SuccessMatrix™, scoring includes:

• Sovereignty alignment

• Enclave separation score

• Identity trust complexity rating

• Exposure surface reduction

• Crisis readiness score

• Supply chain / OTA integrity score

Each scored on a 0–5 doctrinal assurance scale.

Time Line (90 Days)

Weeks 1–2: Doctrinal Briefing + Readiness Assessment
Weeks 3–6: Enclave Setup + TrustNet™ identity mapping
Weeks 7–9: AegisAI™ modeling + QuickStrike™ preparation
Weeks 10–12: Full simulation (SecureTrain™ GOV injects)
Week 13: Doctrinal Readiness Summary delivered
Week 14: Deployment Proposal

Critical Infrastructure—Deployment Documentation

Mission Scope

Deploy a sovereign enclave and doctrinal governance model enabling federal or government agencies to operate under Zero Doctrine™ conditions, eliminating cross-domain exposure and modern nation-state attack vectors.
Includes identity governance, enclave lockdown, deception terrain modeling, and crisis-response alignment.

Doctrinal Articles Applied

• Article I — Digital Sovereignty

• Article III — Identity & Trust Governance

• Article V — Systems, Exposure, & Deception Terrain

• Article VI — LAWS™ (Land, Air, Water, Space) Domain Governance

• Article VIII — Multi-Partner Resilience Exercises

• Article X — Supply Chain Integrity & OTA Control

Annexes:

• Annex II — Protocol Registry

• Annex IV — Red Team Doctrine Brief

• Annex V — Enclave Registry

Protocols Involved

• DNA™ — Data Nexus Assignment

• S.T.E.A.L.T.H.™ — Air-gapped sovereign enclaves

• TrustNet™ — Identity quorum governance

• Multi-Net Framework™ — GovNet isolation

• AegisAI™ — Predictive defense & adversarial deception

• QuickStrike™ — Crisis containment

• REVIVE™ — Resilience validation

• PHOENIX™ — Post-breach regeneration

• QuantumGuard™ — PQC enforcement

• AuditNet™ — Regulatory oversight enclave

Expected Outcomes

• Elimination of cross-domain exposure across federal mission systems

• Sovereign control of identity, access, and mission data

• Mission-critical workloads removed from public internet reliance

• Improved warfighting-grade cyber posture

• Executive-level doctrinal readiness

• A validated enclave with measurable SuccessMatrix™ scoring

• Pilot-to-deployment path established for wider agency adoption

Resource Requirements

• Pilot leadership group (CIO/CISO, mission owner, trust officer)

• 3–5 technical operators or enclave engineers

• Access to current identity systems for TrustNet™ mapping

• One pilot workload or mission use-case

• Dedicated environment (gov cloud, on-prem, or hybrid)

• Executive access for simulations

Readiness Scoring

Based on SuccessMatrix™, scoring includes:

• Sovereignty alignment

• Enclave separation score

• Identity trust complexity rating

• Exposure surface reduction

• Crisis readiness score

• Supply chain / OTA integrity score

Each scored on a 0–5 doctrinal assurance scale.

Timeline (90 Days)

Weeks 1–2: Doctrinal Briefing + Readiness Assessment
Weeks 3–6: Enclave Setup + TrustNet™ identity mapping
Weeks 7–9: AegisAI™ modeling + QuickStrike™ preparation
Weeks 10–12: Full simulation (SecureTrain™ GOV injects)
Week 13: Doctrinal Readiness Summary delivered
Week 14: Deployment Proposal

Defense Contractor & OEM Pilot—Deployment Documentation

Mission Scope

Enable defense contractors, integrators, aerospace firms, and OEMs to embed Zero Doctrine™ into their internal engineering, R&D, supply chain, and product lines — ensuring sovereign origin, enclave R&D, and compliance alignment for government contracting.

Doctrinal Articles Applied

• Article I — Digital Sovereignty

• Article III — Identity & Trust

• Article V — Exposure Control & Sovereign Origination Clause

• Article IX — Interoperability & Controlled Exchange

• Article X — Supply Chain & OTA Integrity

Annexes:

• Annex II — Protocol Registry

• Annex VI — Protocol Mutation Policy

• Annex VII — Partner Classification Framework

Protocols Involved

• Multi-Net Security Framework™

• S.T.E.A.L.T.H.™ for R&D Enclaves

• DNA™ for prototype data

• TrustNet™ for engineering identity governance

• Titan Series™ (TitanOS™, TitanGate™, TitanAI™)

• AegisAI™ adversarial modeling

• DataGuardian™ for IP lifecycle control

• SuccessMatrix™ for OEM assurance

Expected Outcomes

• OEM-aligned doctrine for federal contracting

• Verified sovereign origin of all technical inputs

• Enclave-based R&D, testing, and manufacturing workflows

• Cross-partner trust enforcement

• Supply chain assurance improvements

• Higher competitiveness in defense bids

Resource Requirements

• Chief Engineer / CTO

• Security & compliance leadership

• R&D and prototype environment access

• Supply chain oversight

• One engineering workload or subsystem

• Contracting liaison

Readiness Scoring

OEM version of SuccessMatrix™ evaluates:

• Sovereign origin compliance

• Supply chain integrity

• Enclave isolation readiness

• Identity governance (TrustNet™)

• Protocol Mutation alignment (Annex VI)

• OEM classification level (Annex VII)

Timeline (90 Days)

Weeks 1–2: R&D + supply chain doctrine audit
Weeks 3–6: Enclave setup + Multi-Net integration
Weeks 7–8: AegisAI™ adversarial modeling
Weeks 9–10: OEM SecureTrain™ Simulation
Weeks 11–12: Mutation policy alignment (Annex VI)
Week 13–14: Doctrine Deployment Proposal

Enterprise (Fortune 500) Pilot—Deployment Documentation

Mission Scope

Transition a large-scale commercial enterprise into a sovereign, constitution-governed cyber posture by deploying an enclave, governance controls, identity enforcement, and crisis-preparedness doctrine.

Doctrinal Articles Applied

• Article I — Sovereignty

• Article III — Identity & Trust

• Article IV — Data Rights & Classification

• Article V — System Exposure & Deception Terrain

• Article VII — Continuity & Crisis Response

Annexes:

• Annex II — Protocol Registry

• Annex III — Variance Reports

• Annex V — Enclave Registry

Protocols Involved

• TrustNet™ — Enterprise identity governance

• DataGuardian™ — Data rights and lifecycle enforcement

• DNA™ segmentation

• TitanVault™ — sensitive data air-gapped storage

• AegisAI™ — attack surface prediction

• QuickStrike™ — crisis protocol

• REVIVE™ — resilience validation for continuity

• SuccessMatrix™ — enterprise governance scoring

Expected Outcomes

• Removal of systemic single-points-of-failure

• Executive-level doctrinal alignment

• Resilient operations under attack conditions

• Reduced exposure to ransomware, AI threats, and supply chain breaches

• Verified identity governance

• Board-ready governance reporting

Resource Requirements

• CISO/CIO

• Data governance officers

• Security engineering team

• Access to identity systems

• One business-critical workload for enclave isolation

• Executive participation in SecureTrain™

Readiness Scoring

Enterprise SuccessMatrix™ evaluates:

• Identity governance

• Data lifecycle discipline

• Deception terrain alignment

• Exposure reduction

• Continuity posture

• Leadership responsiveness under simulation

Timeline (90 Days)

Weeks 1–2: Governance assessment
Weeks 3–5: Enclave deployment
Weeks 6–7: TrustNet™ identity mapping
Weeks 8–9: AegisAI™ predictive modeling
Weeks 10–11: SecureTrain™ Enterprise Simulation
Week 12: Variance report
Week 13–14: Deployment Proposal